SkillShark vs. TeamGenius

Both SkillShark and TeamGenius help sports organizations replace paper evaluations and spreadsheets with digital athlete scoring, rankings, and reports. However, there are important differences in how the platforms handle athlete rankings, customer support, pricing, and evaluation security.

Why choose SkillShark? SkillShark gives organizations greater control over how athletes are ranked, with normalized, raw, averaged, custom-weighted, and position-specific reporting options to support more informed team selection decisions. Every paid plan includes one-on-one onboarding, a dedicated Customer Success Manager, and 24/7 support. Unlike TeamGenius, which ties athlete limits to subscription tiers, SkillShark lets organizations add athletes at their existing per-athlete rate without paying for a more expensive feature tier they don't need. SkillShark’s individually authenticated evaluator accounts and customizable security roles provide additional accountability and control over evaluation data compared to TeamGenius’s shared access scoring keys.

Explore Why Sports Organizations Choose SkillShark

01 - More Ways to Rank Athletes Beyond Simple Averages

02 - Dedicated Customer Support on Every Paid Plan

03 - Predictable Per-Athlete Pricing as You Grow

04 - Secure Athlete Evaluations and Customizable Permissions

1. More Ways to Rank Athletes Beyond Simple Averages

Simple averages don't always tell the full story in athlete rankings, especially when multiple evaluators are involved. Some coaches are tougher graders, while others consistently give higher scores.

Unlike TeamGenius's simple average-based rankings, SkillShark's normalized rankings account for these differences in evaluator scoring ranges, helping organizations make more informed decisions.

The Flaw of Simple Averaging in Player Evaluation Rankings

Consider two evaluators scoring different groups of athletes on a 1 - 10 scale.

Coach A - Tough Evaluator: 7/10 is their highest score given

Coach B - Generous Evaluator: 7/10 is their lowest score given

Let’s say, Athlete A receives a 7/10 from Coach A, while Athlete B also receives a 7/10 from Coach B.

With TeamGenius's simple average-based rankings, a 7 is a 7 regardless of context. Both athletes would receive the same ranking, even though Athlete A scored at the top of their evaluator's range and Athlete B scored at the bottom of theirs. 

SkillShark’s normalized rankings account for this difference. In this example, Athlete A would rank higher than Athlete B based on their relative performance within each evaluator’s scoring range.

Original scores remain unchanged and accessible, with raw and averaged reports providing additional context for team selection decisions.

SkillShark Offers More Than Just Normalized Player Rankings

• Raw and averaged scores: Review results in the Score Overview report, or click into normalized rankings in the All Scores report to see each evaluator's original scores.

• Custom-weighted rankings: Assign percentage weights to skills and metrics based on your organization’s team selection criteria.
  

• Position-specific rankings: Generate separate rankings for each position using custom criteria and weights, such as pitching velocity for pitchers, or pop time for catchers.

*Rather than relying on simple averages alone, SkillShark gives coaches greater control over how they analyze results and rank athletes. Your organization makes the final team selection decisions, and 95% of surveyed SkillShark customers reported improved fairness in the selection process.

Source: SkillShark 2025 Customer Survey.

2. Dedicated Customer Support Included on Every Paid Plan

Tryouts and athlete evaluations often take place on evenings and weekends, making reliable support outside of business hours critical. Every paid SkillShark subscription tier includes one-on-one onboarding, a dedicated Customer Success Manager, and 24/7 email and phone support.

In contrast, TeamGenius's support and onboarding vary by tier, and customers may be billed for additional support sessions depending on their plan. SkillShark’s commitment to customer support is backed by 9 years of positive Google reviews, with customers regularly praising the team’s responsiveness and personalized service.

What Do Customers Say About Support?

Based on analysis of publicly available Google reviews as of October 2026. Reviews span approximately 9 years for SkillShark and 4 years for TeamGenius. Individual reviews may mention multiple support themes.

What Support Do You Get for Your Money?

Comparison of each platform’s lowest-priced paid subscription, based on publicly available pricing page information as of October 2026. All prices in USD.

3. Predictable Per-Athlete Pricing as Your Organization Grows

With SkillShark, organizations choose their subscription tier based on the features they need, then pay per athlete based on the number of athletes they plan to evaluate. Annual pricing starts at $5 per athlete on SkillShark's "Rookie" plan, with the flexibility to add athletes at their existing per-athlete rate without upgrading to a higher subscription tier. 

In contrast, TeamGenius's subscription tiers have fixed athlete limits, meaning organizations that exceed a plan's athlete cap by even a small number may need to pay substantially more for the next tier, even if they don't need the additional features. TeamGenius also charges extra for feature add-ons and bills for additional support sessions on certain plans, meaning the advertised subscription price does not always reflect an organization's total cost.

How Does SkillShark Pricing Compare to TeamGenius?

Add Athletes Without Upgrading Your Plan

With TeamGenius, an organization evaluating 501 athletes falls into the same $2,900 annual subscription as a program evaluating 1,000 athletes. Exceeding an athlete limit by even a small number can mean moving to a higher subscription tier, resulting in up to $3,600 in additional costs. With SkillShark, organizations can add athletes at their existing per-athlete rate without changing tiers.

The following comparisons show how TeamGenius's fixed athlete limits affect annual subscription costs, compared to SkillShark's predictable per-athlete pricing on the "Rookie" tier.

Pricing Comparison: 500 vs. 525 Athletes

Pricing Comparison: 1,000 vs. 1,025 Athletes

SkillShark offers more predictable, scalable pricing, allowing organizations to grow their evaluations without facing substantial subscription increases tied to fixed athlete limits.

Start for Free

Published annual starting prices in USD as of October 2026. SkillShark licenses are sold in increments of 25. Comparisons use the lowest-priced advertised plans accommodating each athlete count. TeamGenius add-on costs are not included.

4. Secure Athlete Evaluations with Customizable User Permissions

SkillShark takes a comprehensive approach to evaluation security, combining individual password-protected evaluator accounts, administrator-controlled invitations, score auditing, and fully customizable security roles. This helps organizations prevent unauthorized scoring, maintain evaluator accountability, and limit access to athlete information.

On the other hand, TeamGenius prioritizes convenience over security through shared access keys and self-entered evaluator identities, creating a greater risk of unauthorized scoring or impersonation. 

How Does SkillShark’s Security Compare to TeamGenius?

Comparison based on publicly available product information as of October 2026.

See Why Sports Organizations Choose SkillShark

Whether you're replacing paper evaluations or exploring athlete evaluation platforms, you want software that gives your coaches confidence in their team selection decisions and is easy for your staff to adopt. With SkillShark, every paid plan includes one-on-one onboarding, a dedicated Customer Success Manager, and 24/7 support, so your organization has someone to turn to before, during, and after tryouts.